Re: cvs Projects to git Repositories?

Michael Haggerty <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:49:31 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.cvs2svn.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 01/25/2014 10:11 AM, Scott wrote:
>    I have successfully converted cvs.adligo.org <http://cvs.adligo.org>
> to git, but the way tags and branches work in git don't really work with
> my versions which are generally done at the cvs project level. 
> 
> So I tried it again specifying my usual CVSROOT with a trailing
> /projectName and this seems to have gotten the tags correctly.
> 
> I would mention something to this effect here;
> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html
>  in the usage section as it is neat that it works either way;

Thanks for your feedback.

The basic rule for choosing how to divide your CVS repository into one
or more Git repositories is as follows:

Each Git repository should cover a single "project", where a project is
a part of the source that is typically branched and tagged as a unit.

This is the same criterion for deciding how to break up a CVS repository
into a single-project vs. multi-project Subversion repository.

Why don't you propose a patch to the documentation that you think would
have made this clearer to you?

Thanks,
Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
[email protected]
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------------------
http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1670&dsMessageId=3072080

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].