Re: Adding CMake to 1.15.x release notes

On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 at 10:00, Daniel Sahlberg <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Den tors 23 juli 2026 kl 05:04 skrev Nathan Hartman <
> [email protected]>:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 6:03 PM Thomas Åkesson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
> [...]
>
>

> > > Well, it sounds like that won't use Javascript, so sure, +1 to that.
>> > >
>> > > Another thing that is lacking: the original Google Docs spreadsheet
>> > > had cell background colors, like green for Yes and red for No. I lost
>> > > all of this formatting when I exported the table to HTML and then
>> > > search-and-replaced stuff in the resulting HTML to match how we do
>> > > tables elsewhere. I wanted to reinstate the colors but it seems we
>> > > don't currently have the CSS for it. I didn't want to just rush in and
>> > > tack on a few more CSS classes in style/site.css, but I also didn't
>> > > want to add CSS tags to every td tag. WDYT?
>> >
>> > Just want to mention the html <details> element that might be a viable
>> alternative.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Thomas Å.
>> >
>>
>> [...]


> Regarding highlighting of the Yes/No/NA-boxes, feel free to add something
> in the CSS. We already have something called a task-table but it is only
> suitable to highlight a complete row (you set the class "completed" on the
> <tr> element as far as I understand). How about something like this?
>
> Not a strong opinion, but between two of these options I like the colored
backgrounds more. Both of them are readable, but the background variant
does that without adding visual glyphs to every row.

But I am fine with both approaches.

>
-- 
Ivan Zhakov