Re: State of BDB FS backend
"C. Michael Pilato" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:59:37 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABUQHU5bz6DydAet08Nosh1nfCLMt4yGVm7MxvbiRSCwgSze2Q@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000004eef600657b6506a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 9:58=E2=80=AFAM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nathan@gmai= l.com> wrote: > > Currently 'svnadmin help create' has this to say about the --fs-type arg: > > --fs-type ARG : type of repository: > 'fsfs' (default), 'bdb' or 'fsx' > CAUTION: FSX is for EXPERIMENTAL use only! > > Perhaps there should also be a "WARNING: BDB will be removed in an > upcoming release?" or something to that effect? > > I'll not weigh in right now on the merits of removing the BDB backend this side of 2.0, but this modification to the 'svnadmin help create' usage text seems to me a good idea *regardless. * I mean, we *know* that day is coming eventually, be it 1.x or 2.0. --0000000000004eef600657b6506a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"background-color:transpare= nt">On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 9:58=E2=80=AFAM Nathan Hartman <<a href=3D"m= ailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:</sp= an></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class= =3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg= b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br> Currently 'svnadmin help create' has this to say about the --fs-typ= e arg:<br> <br> =C2=A0 --fs-type ARG=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : type of rep= ository:<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0'fsfs' (default), 'bdb' or &= #39;fsx'<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0CAUTION: FSX is for EXPERIMENTAL use only!<b= r> <br> Perhaps there should also be a "WARNING: BDB will be removed in an<br> upcoming release?" or something to that effect?<br> <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'll not weigh in right now on the= merits of removing the BDB backend this side of 2.0, but this modification= to the 'svnadmin help create' usage text seems to me a good idea <= i>regardless.=C2=A0</i>=C2=A0I mean, we <i>know</i> that day is coming even= tually, be it 1.x or 2.0.</div></div></div> --0000000000004eef600657b6506a--