Re: svn commit: r1936555 - in subversion/site/staging: . blog docs docs/community-guide docs/release-notes pronunciation security style

Nathan Hartman <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:13:38 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel
Message-ID <CAJT2EHpPuCisTn01EjK+njHdEBpzBWjOYANLaEwoajVTSwPb=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 9:46=E2=80=AFAM Branko =C4=8Cibej <[email protected]=
> wrote:
(snip long earlier quoted text)
> Changing this in the source code just smells wrong to me. I had a quick l=
ook and it appears that none of the HTML responses from apache.org have any=
 cache control headers set. However, the response for our 'style/site.css' =
does have both ETag and Last-Modified (about 3 hours ago on the main site, =
apparently). Still, since there's no Cache-Control max_age or similar, any =
browser can decide to cache the page as long as it likes.
>
> The correct way to fix this is to set cache-control headers appropriately=
, but this should be done by Infra, not us.
>
> -- Brane

This sounds like the correct solution to me.

I'm happy to ask Infra; what max age should we ask for? Is there some
customary value for this?

Thanks,
Nathan