Re: [PATCH] INSTALL: clarify that libserf is auto-detected by pkg-config
Nathan Hartman <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:44:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJT2EHonyJGXH1XBeJ0voQM7BgVRK8Md=Ob26FvfNfORwKQ2pg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 2:04=E2=80=AFPM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nathan@gmail= .com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 12:37=E2=80=AFPM Pavel Lyalyakin via dev <dev@subv= ersion.apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hello, > > (snip) >> >> The thing is that the INSTALL document needs a major rework (I think tha= t everyone can agree with this). > > (snip) > > I agree with this! > > It is something I have looked into in the past, but every time I did, I b= ecame overwhelmed by how extensively INSTALL needed to change. > > One good thing is that after the CMake & vcpkg build becomes the "officia= l" way to build on Windows in 1.16, a huge amount of cruft can be removed (= all of section II-E). That will result in renumbering the later sections, s= o maybe it's a good time to just go in there with a wrecking ball. > > Thanks for giving INSTALL some much needed love!! > > By the way, I don't agree that it's not glamorous: for many users, INSTAL= L is likely one of the first pieces of documentation they encounter once th= ey decide to try Subversion. It was for me when I installed Subversion for = my $dayjob for the first time in 2007. INSTALL was very good, very clear, a= nd it gave me confidence that I was dealing with a well made tool. There's = something glamorous in that :-) > > Cheers, I have nominated both changes (r1936876, r1936877) for backport to 1.15.x in r1936879. Cheers, Nathan