[jira] [Closed] (SVN-4861) Automation of SVN without "plaintest password store" is clunky
"Alexander Falb (Jira)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.issues |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Alexander Falb closed SVN-4861.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Feedback Received
Thanks. I will switch over to the mailing list, in case I'm not able to progress on my own.
> Automation of SVN without "plaintest password store" is clunky
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SVN-4861
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4861
> Project: Subversion
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0
> Reporter: Alexander Falb
> Priority: Major
>
> [Since 1.12.0 the plaintext-password-store is disable on Linux on compile time|https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.12#client-server-improvements]. This makes it very hard to automate Subversion on Linux in a "headless" environment like a docker container.
> In my particular situation on some conditions a dockerized script needs to commit a few files to SVN. My current approach is to start a gpg-agent (or reconnect to it if its already running), preload the password in gpg-agent (because gpg-agent might have expired it) and finally do the SVN commit. I however first need to calculate the md5 hash of the SVN auth realm, to identify the gpg-agent key-handle.
> Overall a lot of steps that would not be necessary if SVN would save the passwords in it's plaintext store. In the end I'm now keeping a plaintext store to preload gpg-agent, I have a process running in my container that could be omitted and the script is a lot clunkier than needed.
>
> Please advice if my approach is the way to go or if I'm doing something terribly wrong.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)