Re: [scons-dev] Re: Subversion -> Mercurial switching rather than interworking
anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:17:35 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.rapidsvn.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.mercurial.hgsubversion |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPkN8x+9=ryLm8928ZweHLjS1AikxeD10-MD7EVK4AeE2xf9_Q__17107.2878213183$1315902345$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we made life easy for ourselves by not pruning. This may or may > not have been the right decision, but we can always do editing later. This was a bad decision. You can do editing when everybody fork the project, but that has bad consequences, which all affect project image. As a result of insufficient preparation there are a couple of large files like vc9redist__x86.exe that increase repository size. Next time, please, create build scripts and do checks against: 1. Large files in history 2. Dead branches I hope SCons changes will never be committed as premature and untested as this conversion was done. -- anatoly t. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hgsubversion" group. To post to this group, send email to hgsubversion-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hgsubversion?hl=en.