Re: merge in RapidSVN has different results than with command line
Alexander Mueller <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:27:29 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.rapidsvn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To make a long story short: merging is RapidSVN's weakest feature now. Seems like few people actually use it (otherwise we would have plenty of bug reports and/or patches). If you take the options for merging and the options for the svn commandline alone you see RapidSVN only has a very minimal subset of the available options and the one implemented isnt a typical usecase (in contrast to the default behaviour of the svn commandline). Am 09.03.2011 01:07, schrieb [email protected]: > I've been using svn in a linux environment from the command line for a while and some of my windows using co-workers want to get on source control bandwagon. We've chosen to use RapidSVN because the client exists for Mac, 'nix and Windows. > > I'm running into a problem with merging. > When I merge from the command line, additons, deletions and modifications all end up in my target copy. However, not so with RapidSVN. > > Firstly, in the log message window, it only shows updates, when I know that there should be additions (new directory with files). > Secondly, none of the files are actually modfied, either on the filesystem or in the RapidSVN right hand pane. > > I suspect that it might be user error, because the information you pass to RapidSVN for a merge is a little different than you do with svn from the command line. > > This is what I've been doing. > 1) updating both the working copy of the branch and trunk > 2) entering the path for the working copy branch in the first working copy box, with the latest revision as shown in the Log > 3) entering the path for the working copy trunk in the second workign copy, with the lastest revision as shown in the log > 4) entering the path for the working copy trunk in the destination path > 5) keeping recursive checked > > When I click OK, the log message reports > > Execute: Merge > Updated: /tmp/trunk/control/xxxxx.ctl > Updated: /tmp/trunk/control > Updated: /tmp/trunk/bad > Updated: /tmp/trunk/bin/xxxx.lst > Updated: /tmp/trunk/bin/xxx.ksh > Updated: /tmp/trunk/bin > Updated: /tmp/trunk > Updating... > Ready > > But none of the additions (new directory and files show up). Then if I check the status with the command line, these files don't show up as modified... > > Is this user error on my part or is the "merge" in RapidSVN supposed to perform differently than a svn merge command? > > Thanks for your help. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=671&dsMessageId=2710308 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. ------------------------------------------------------ http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=671&dsMessageId=2710612 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].