Re: Does Subclipse depend on JDT?
Mark Phippard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.subclipse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFaGCrknip8Jt8Sm2V1X98icefgM2UEe-_+P0Rs4u-+Rcvshw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Sebastian Bauer <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 20:10:41 +0200, Sebastian Bauer wrote: > > if I install Subclipse on a plain Eclipse platform installation > > (Platform Runtime Binary), which previously didn't offer the Java > > perspective, then, after installing the main Subclipse plugin, the > > Java > > perspective is offered. I would not have expected that. Is this a > > known > > issue of Subclipse or may another component be the reason? In one of > > my > > installations, I like to use Subclipse, but I don't need JDT. > > I dug in the source. The Subclipse UI module optionally depends on > org.eclipse.jdt.ui and org.eclipse.jdt.core, but as there is no control > whether optional components are used nor not, it is installed. See > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Publisher about this. Especially the > Note section. Basically, it is recommended to move the features that > optionally depend on something into an own feature. This makes sense to > me. > > I wonder if it would make a difference if we removed the dependencies and instead used "Import-Package" in our manifest? Does anyone know how that will change the P2 metadata that is generated? -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2984820 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].