Re: Re: Re: New to Subclipse
Mark Phippard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.subclipse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFaGCpCoA4_NZp4tafrM__L3PO49RYJSk-iDYyEAzNvnskj3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:45 AM, David Aldrich <[email protected]>wrote: That's clear, thanks very much. > > I would like to ask one more question of a more general nature. If you > have time, I would appreciate your comments. > > I notice that Subclipse uses SVNKit. I have also noticed posts in the svn > users mailing list that suggest that svn 1.7 works slowly on network drives > compared with 1.6, and that work is ongoing in the svn client to improve > svn 1.7's speed by optimising the MySQL queries used. My question is, how > does such optimisation get transferred to SVNKit? Is there a similar focus > on performance in the SVNKit community? > You would really have to ask them. http://svnkit.com It is possible their performance is better or worse in this situation. Their code is completely different so it has different performance characteristics. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2990346 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].