Re: Could SVNKit be the default SVN implementation instead of JavaHL?
Mark Phippard <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:08:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.subclipse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFaGCrgWJJuo160QfY4qQh1AAvkNQbf+HjPYBc8La6p153njA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Nick Boldt <[email protected]> wrote: > So... if I simply remove > org.tigris.subversion.clientadapter.javahl.feature from our installed > feature set, the user experience will be simpler as then the default > selected implementation will be SVNKit. Yes, exactly. Just do not include the JavaHL feature in the install and SVNKit will be the default (provided that you installed that feature and the SVNKit library). > I suppose that *is* better, but there will be no mention of JavaHL, > leaving all JavaHL related activity as an exercise for the reader, > should they so desire it. Right. But given that they probably need to install the JavaHL RPM and edit the ini file for the launcher to make the library available this is probably what you wanted anyway. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=3057703 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].