Re: Re: Subclipse not working in Mars with UNC working copy

------=_Part_6251_906384747.1458847565829
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Richard Davies <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Let me add some additional details. It's currently working fine with a UNC
> path in Kepler with Subclipse 1.12 and JavaHL 1.9.3. (BTW, even though I
> used http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.12.x the version number of the
> plugin as reported by Eclipse after the installation is still 1.10.13... is
> that to be expected? Why is Eclipse not reporting 1.12?)
>

Yes, it is to be expected.  We cannot host two versions of JavaHL on same
update site.  Right now, the only difference between the versions is the
JavaHL version.  Someday, if/when we add SVN 1.9-specific features, then
there will be a 1.12 version.  But for now, trying to stick to one version.


> I'm using the same version of Subclipse and JavaHL in Mars (and the same
> project definition) but it's not working. I've even tried going back to
> earlier versions of Subclipse and JavaHL in my Mars installation but that
> had no effect.


We still build Subclipse on Eclipse 3.2.  There is really no code that
cares what version of Eclipse you are using.  Maybe something in Eclipse
changed, but I would not know what it is. If the Eclipse Resource
properties on a file shows the same path names in both versions I would not
expect there to be any differences.


-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=3167144

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
------=_Part_6251_906384747.1458847565829
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Richard Davies <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">=
[email protected]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra=
"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Let me add some=
 additional details. It&#39;s currently working fine with a UNC path in Kep=
ler with Subclipse 1.12 and JavaHL 1.9.3. (BTW, even though I used <a href=
=3D"http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.12.x" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D=
"_blank">http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.12.x</a> the version number o=
f the plugin as reported by Eclipse after the installation is still 1.10.13=
... is that to be expected? Why is Eclipse not reporting 1.12?)<br></blockq=
uote><div><br></div><div>Yes, it is to be expected.=C2=A0 We cannot host tw=
o versions of JavaHL on same update site.=C2=A0 Right now, the only differe=
nce between the versions is the JavaHL version.=C2=A0 Someday, if/when we a=
dd SVN 1.9-specific features, then there will be a 1.12 version.=C2=A0 But =
for now, trying to stick to one version.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid=
;padding-left:1ex">I&#39;m using the same version of Subclipse and JavaHL i=
n Mars (and the same project definition) but it&#39;s not working. I&#39;ve=
 even tried going back to earlier versions of Subclipse and JavaHL in my Ma=
rs installation but that had no effect.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>We =
still build Subclipse on Eclipse 3.2.=C2=A0 There is really no code that ca=
res what version of Eclipse you are using.=C2=A0 Maybe something in Eclipse=
 changed, but I would not know what it is. If the Eclipse Resource properti=
es on a file shows the same path names in both versions I would not expect =
there to be any differences.</div></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>--=
 <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">Thanks<br><br>Mark Phippard<br><a href=
=3D"http://markphip.blogspot.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://markphip.blogsp=
ot.com/</a></div>
</div></div>

------=_Part_6251_906384747.1458847565829--