Re: svn commit: r1933188 - subversion/branches/1.15.x

I expected the svn-role script to commit this backport last night but it
seems something is wrong. I hope to take a look at it tonight.

/Daniel

mån 20 apr. 2026 kl. 18:19 skrev <[email protected]>:

> Author: ivan
> Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
> New Revision: 1933188
>
> Log:
> * STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving.
>
> Modified:
>    subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS   Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026
> (r1933187)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS   Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
> (r1933188)
> @@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes:
>     Votes:
>       +1 (not binding): brane
>
> - * r1931549
> -   Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working
> copy
> -   checks if we have the pristine file content.
> -   Justification:
> -     Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working
> copies with
> -     pristine contents.
> -   Notes:
> -     Discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
> -   Votes:
> -     +1: kotkov, rinrab
> -
>  Veto-blocked changes:
>  =====================
>
> @@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes:
>       +0: hartmannathan
>       +1 (not binding): brane
>       +1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan
> +
> + * r1931549
> +   Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working
> copy
> +   checks if we have the pristine file content.
> +   Justification:
> +     Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working
> copies with
> +     pristine contents.
> +   Notes:
> +     Discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
> +   Votes:
> +     +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan
>
>