Re: Proposed backports to 1.9.x branch

Stefan Küng <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.tortoisesvn.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 04.05.2017 17:27, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I propose to back the following changes to TortoiseSVN 1.9.x branch:
> * r27068-27070,27072-27074
>   Do not wait for TSVNCache.exe when it's disabled. This saves about
> 100ms before every operation when status cache is disabled.
>
> * r27071,r27077
>   Obtain HEAD revision before Update operation using separate request
> to the server only we have PreUpdateHook configured.
>
>   This could save up to 500ms for the common case, because
> establishing new connection to the server may take a while over high
> latency network, especially if https and authentication is involved.
>
> * r27787
>   Manifest TortoiseBlame and TortoiseUDiff as DPI-aware. TortoiseMerge
> and TortoiseProc are already manifested as DPI-aware.
>
> * r27797, r27800
>   Fix drawing icons in CFilterEdit that used to filter history and log
> messages on High-DPI displays.
>
> All changes merge without conflicts. What do you think?

I'm ok with backporting those changes. But if you do, please add an 
entry to the changelog.txt file for each of those changes before 
backporting. And then of course backport the change to the changelog as 
well.

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest interface to (Sub)version control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=3233886

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.