Re: question on SVN.EXE binary distribution vendors
Daniel Sahlberg <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2025 21:13:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMHy98ORbEuYup0nY2oj1HBJUA4cRQfwE=JdMkdFLvRQAck4ew@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000002b3da9063a9d81d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Den ons 23 juli 2025 kl 15:43 skrev Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 9:25=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Sahlberg > <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > Cirata, VisualSVN and SlikSVN on the other hand are commercial entities > and it might be possible to negotiate support contracts with them, > something that may be important for a service to run =E2=80=9Dextremely w= ell=E2=80=9D. > > > > TortoiseSVN is very much volunteer driven. > > > > I doubt there are much differences between the projects with regards to > stability, except they might contain different versions of the > dependencies. For example TortoiseSVN currently bundle a version of OpenS= SL > which seems to crash on ARM under some circumstances. > > I personally found VisualSVN a little frustrating, and I would not > recommend them. Searching for a source file in the web app takes > forever. It is painfully slow. And trying to search their mailing list > or web forums is a no-go because they don't have them. There's no body > of knowledge to search for solutions to problems like slow search. > > Jeff > I have found VisualSVN's support very responsive, but we ($dayjob) are on one of the paid license tiers. Cheers, Daniel --0000000000002b3da9063a9d81d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Den ons 23 juli 2025 kl 15:43 skrev Jeffr= ey Walton <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&= gt;:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote clas= s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid r= gb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 9:25=E2=80=AFAM D= aniel Sahlberg<br> <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">daniel= [email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> > [...]<br> > Cirata, VisualSVN and SlikSVN on the other hand are commercial entitie= s and it might be possible to negotiate support contracts with them, someth= ing that may be important for a service to run =E2=80=9Dextremely well=E2= =80=9D.<br> ><br> > TortoiseSVN is very much volunteer driven.<br> ><br> > I doubt there are much differences between the projects with regards t= o stability, except they might contain different versions of the dependenci= es. For example TortoiseSVN currently bundle a version of OpenSSL which see= ms to crash on ARM under some circumstances.<br> <br> I personally found VisualSVN a little frustrating, and I would not<br> recommend them. Searching for a source file in the web app takes<br> forever. It is painfully slow. And trying to search their mailing list<br> or web forums is a no-go because they don't have them. There's no b= ody<br> of knowledge to search for solutions to problems like slow search.<br> <br> Jeff<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I have found VisualSVN's suppo= rt very responsive, but we ($dayjob) are on one of the paid license tiers.<= /div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Daniel</div><div><br></div></div= ></div> --0000000000002b3da9063a9d81d5--