Re: CinePaint Film Gimp plans

>> Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:

> Well, the situation is that there is work on Gtk but I would much 
> more like to contribute to Glasgow even if indirect through the Gtk 
> branch. The i18n stuff had driven me too far from Glasgow, ending even in 
> half gtk2 support. Too much work for me for this still desireable goal.

I would definitely drop gtk2 - it is probably as much work as Glasgow, 
and Glasgow could certainly use more hands.


> 
> But I feel the need to justify my contributions for CinePaint Film Gimp. 
> In this sense I opened the discussion thread.

 From my past Googling on Cinepaint I'm guessing that you probably know
as much about the scope of these projects as anyone and are therefore
the best person to judge where time should be allocated.

I think maintenance and stabilization are the way to go for Film Gimp.
The goal would be to have something useful out there to attract people
to the project. No new features - just fixes for existing code and
regular releases of updates.  i18n is a worthy goal, but it probably
does not make sense if it comes at the expense of everything else.

> regards
> Kai-Uwe Behrmann
>                                 + development for color management 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV