Re: CinePaint SCons Packager

Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:04:27 +0100 (CET)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.cinepaint.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 29.02.08, 11:55 -0800 schrieb H. S. Teoh:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:05:05PM +0100, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> > Am 29.02.08, 11:07 -0800 schrieb H. S. Teoh:
> > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:13:21PM +0100, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> > > > Am 29.02.08, 09:18 -0800 schrieb H. S. Teoh:

> > > Anyway, it seems that I'm seeing two problems, which are related:
> > > 
> > > 1) Running autoconf doesn't expand the GTK1 macros, so the resulting
> > > configure script is broken (that's where the syntax error comes from).
> > 
> > For developers it is adviceable to have Gtk1 installed. A alternative
> > would be to drop Gtk1 completely. Then we can not continue with
> > gtk-osx, which is not what we want.
> 
> Hmm. Is there no way to make configure smart enough to skip the gtk1
> check when it's not installed? Currently, it seems that anyone who wants
> to build cinepaint must install gtk1, even if they're building it for
> gtk2 only. We shouldn't drop gtk1 support, but it would be nice to not
> *require* it when you have gtk2.
 
If we take over the gtk1 macros into our tree I am afraid we, me, will 
have a long route to get it seamless working. The macros potentially 
conflict with system provided ones.
 
kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
-- 
developing for colour management 
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/