Re: controversial question (could be my fault).
Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:26:06 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.cinepaint.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gimp will probably use UFraw for converting the RAW files. CinePaint may use the shipped rawphoto plug-in and the shipped dcraw. Both are based on DCraw, a small command line utility. UFraw can be compiled as a CinePaint plug-in since UFraw version 0.13. As DCraw is evolving in quality, so different versions might create different results. kind regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann -- developing for colour management www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org Am 12.03.08, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Rob Lingelbach: > 1) Cinepaint as the latest OSX build from Eric Robinson, I believe > this is v0.22. > > 2) The Gimp version (?) I grabbed it last week and hope it's the > latest. Hard to tell under X what v. it is. > Cinepaint: a lot of detail, but a lot of grain(noise). noise > remained when I dropped the blacks to try to hide grain-noise. > > The Gimp: very little grain, but severely lacking in detail; almost > looked out-of-focus when compared to the Cinepaint image. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/