Re: [CinePaint] cinepaint vs Gimp
Robin Rowe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.cinepaint.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Interestingly, the Gtk widget set was originally invented in order to > support development of the GIMP. The Gtk widget set was designed to > work efficiently with the display systems of the time and its > inventors never considered a need for more color depth or range than > one could see on a computer display. The GIMP extension mechanism > depends heavily on Gtk. The GIMP is a victim of its own success. GTK is about eye candy without regard to code size. GTK is huge, slow, and debugging it is a nightmare. From a project management standpoint, it's undesirable to have the GUI toolkit dwarf the application in code size. FLTK 1.1.7 has a bug in its dual-head code that caused Glasgow to crash. I didn't know that when I released Glasgow 0.1. I fixed the FLTK code quickly and turned around Glasgow 0.2 right away. I was never able to reach a quick fix like that with GTK problems. Robin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV