Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Clk improvements
Daniel Almeida <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.power-management.general,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.pwm,gmane.linux.kernel.clk,gmane.linux.kernel.rust |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Maurice, > On 31 Jul 2026, at 15:37, Maurice Hieronymus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > at your suggestion [0] I rebased my `clk_rate_exclusive_get()` binding for > pwm-th1520 on top of this series, so it is now waiting on it to land. As v5 > has not seen any comments in the last few weeks, I wanted to ask what the > current status is. Nobody has replied so far. I don’t think there are any further comments. > > If there are no blockers left and you expect it to be merged soon, I am > happy to keep waiting. Otherwise I would offer to send my series standalone > against the current `Clk` API and let you rebase on top of mine - it is the > much smaller of the two, touching only `Clk::rate_exclusive_get()` and > pwm_th1520.rs. > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ > > Thanks a lot, > > Maurice Your series might hit the same blocker as this one. Perhaps we can try to get both merged at the same time? @Stephen gentle ping here :) — Daniel _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv