Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Boot logo supplied by the device tree
MÃ xim Pedraza Padilla <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 17:59:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEUXW=FxgN9Zj-1eR2MdxMTyyKTMTUSYHpkcCpuvZKnGYJ-zTA@mail.gmail.com> |
El mar, 4 ago 2026 a las 7:25, Ulrich =C3=96lmann (<[email protected]>) escribi=C3=B3: > I think the issue is broader than upstream submissions. Once such a > device tree is shipped as part of a GPL kernel in a product, the GPL > obligations already apply to that distribution. Therefore, the licensing > implications of embedding a proprietary logo are not limited to upstream > acceptance, they also affect downstream product distributions. Point taken, thanks for spelling it out. I am not qualified to argue the legal side and will not try to, but I follow the reasoning. In practice it reinforces the reserved memory path, which is the one we ship: there the device tree carries only a phandle and the placement, and the image stays a separate file with its own licensing, handled like any other asset in the product. Max