Re: [PATCH] drm/etnaviv: fix runtime PM cleanup during teardown

Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 08:14:34PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> etnaviv_gpu_platform_probe() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() and
> enables runtime PM before registering the component. If component_add()
> fails, the probe path returns without undoing the autosuspend setting
> or disabling runtime PM. The remove path also disables runtime PM
> without calling the matching pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend().
> 
> If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
> is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
> runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
> during teardown, this reference is not dropped and usage_count remains
> unbalanced.

As I've explained elsewhere, this is just misleading. There is no usage
count leak here as the count is balanced whenever the user re-enables
autosuspend through sysfs (by writing a non-negative timeout).

Drivers should clean up after themselves and disable autosuspend, but
this is more of a clean up than a fix and should not be backported.

You've sent upwards of 60 of these in the matter of a just a few days,
some which have even been picked up. Please send follow-ups (replies or
v2s) as soon as possible to prevent further of these from getting
merged.

> The documentation for pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() also notes that it
> is important to undo it with pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() at
> driver exit time, unless runtime PM was initially enabled with
> devm_pm_runtime_enable().
> 
> Undo the autosuspend setting on both probe failure and device removal,
> and disable runtime PM on the component registration failure path.
> 
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
> 
> Fixes: a8c21a5451d8 ("drm/etnaviv: add initial etnaviv DRM driver")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <[email protected]>

Johan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.