Re: ffmpeg-9.0 tarball

Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I briefly talked to thresh about it on IRC the other day, and the plan 
is to retire the gitweb UI on g.v.o, but keep git via ssh and https 
functional.
This should drastically reduce server load caused by scrapers, and keep 
scripts functional for a while longer.

I think a lot of fate clients pull from there, since it is what used to 
be hard coded in the fate-script we provide.

Timo

On 12/08/2026 02:27, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 02:30:50PM -0300, James Almer via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>> On 8/11/2026 2:04 PM, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>>> Hi Dimitry
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Dimitry Andric via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> What does the https://ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg-9.0.tar.xz tarball exactly correspond to? It's not the n9.0 tag, at least.
>>>
>>> its missing a few commits because the script used to create the release pulled
>>> from what was the right server but now is a mirror. And that mirror was a little
>>> behind.
>>
>> g.o.v has been misbehaving for a while now, so maybe we should retire it. I
> 
> I agree
> theres nothing that should be using it, just an occasional script that i forgot abut
> 
> 
>> can't even load it right now, and I think ffmpeg is the only project left
>> there.
> 
> same here
> 
> thx
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.