Re: [Fresco-devel] [patch] GCC 3.2 compatibility

On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 08:54:43PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote:
>
> This will go into CVS once we drop compatibility with gcc 2.95 (after M3 or 
> 0.3 is released?).

While hopefully we'll be able to release M4 relatively quickly after
M3, I'm not willing to count on it.  Ideally, then, M3 should work
with both 2.95 (because people will use it right now), and 3.2
(because people will be trying to make it work with 3.2, and even more
so within a few months).  Is it at all possible to make Babylon work
with both setups?  Possibly using autoconf and/or #ifdef's?  (I know,
that sucks, but if there's no other way...)

It'd be nice anyway, since there will be C++ compilers with bad STL
support around for quite some time yet, and it'd be good if Babylon
was portable enough to be used by other people in other environments.

-- Nathaniel

-- 
Damn the Solar System.  Bad light; planets too distant; pestered with
comets; feeble contrivance; could make a better one myself.
  -- Lord Jeffrey

This email may be read aloud.