Re: [Fresco-devel] updates

Neil Pilgrim wrote:

> What is the situation regarding omni3 vs omni4, and generation of fresco
> rpms for each? is the idea to just do omni4, or one for each, since
> omni4 is not completely packaged yet (at least for debian!).

as far as our source code goes, we can run with both.
And everybody is free to generate rpms for whatever configuration
he wants, it's as simple as 'make rpm' !

I know there are issues with rpms for omni4 for redhat (don't
remember 7.3 or 8.0) as there is a header incompatibility between
the system and openssl, which is used by omni4.
In a nutshell, I'm not sure yet what environment we should
build and publish rpms for, but as generating them is really trivial,
I'm not nervous about that. (I'v seen omni4 rpms somewhere, too...)

As for debian, I hope that we don't need to make any modifications
to our current build system, just update the debian/ directory.

Any takers ?

Stefan

PS: I plan to make some small but important changes to our
     source structure, to better isolate the fresco interfaces,
     language bindings, and demos. So we'll have 'Fresco-IDL',
     'Fresco-C++', and 'Fresco-Python', as well as 'Fresco-C++-demos',
     and 'Fresco-Python-demos'. Now Fresco-IDL and Fresco-C++ are
     in a single package, and Fresco-Python and Fresco-Python-demos
     are together, too.