Re: [Fresco-devel] Re: Cross-platformability

UNIX savvy Brian Witt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.fresco.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:12:46AM -0700, M. Evans wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Even the idealized world postulated by LGPL doesn't work out.
> > Assume an ideal businessman really wants to help the LGPL project.
> > So he submits all his modifications back to the project.  There is
> > still a potential headache.  What if the project *rejects* his
> > changes?  Now, the businessman is under obligation to create his *own*
> > mechanism for source code distribution!  He must offer end users
> > a means to re-link the application using his particular variant of
> > the LGPL code.  He must offer source code to his version of the LGPL
> > library.  It all gets very sticky.
> 
> I think this argument is confused.  Fresco isn't a widget library;
> Fresco is a windowing system.  It's like you're arguing that
> businesspeople cannot write applications for X (or for MS Windows, for
> that matter), because the reality of business code is that it almost
> always requires modifications to the X server or xlib, except in the
> case of X this is okay, because the business can ship binary only X
> servers that can run their application...


If you want an open license written by lawyers, I suggest the CPL
from IBM.  IBM has lots of lawyers, and I'm sure they would "get
things right."

 http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-cplfaq.html

(Got link from the Eclipse FAQ page: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/main.html )


I'm not saying change Fresco, but that here is what lawyers come
up with for a public license.  OpenOffice.org has something similar.
Yes, commercial businesses _do_ want to contribute.  They also want
to feel safe and protected.


The X Consortium license isn't a good starting place, IMHO.  
Anyone remember the XFree86 project declaring a branch from their
code base...?

========================

The topic of licensing using an "GPL" style license comes up
kinda reguarly on various mailing lists.  Is there a newsgroup
or ML where things can be dicussed?  Maybe a few wannabe lawyers
hanging out rendering a legal prespective?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
brian witt    Railroads, computers, sailboats, etc.   [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.