Re: [Fresco-devel] Re: Cross-platformability
UNIX savvy Brian Witt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.fresco.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:12:46AM -0700, M. Evans wrote: > > [snip] > > Even the idealized world postulated by LGPL doesn't work out. > > Assume an ideal businessman really wants to help the LGPL project. > > So he submits all his modifications back to the project. There is > > still a potential headache. What if the project *rejects* his > > changes? Now, the businessman is under obligation to create his *own* > > mechanism for source code distribution! He must offer end users > > a means to re-link the application using his particular variant of > > the LGPL code. He must offer source code to his version of the LGPL > > library. It all gets very sticky. > > I think this argument is confused. Fresco isn't a widget library; > Fresco is a windowing system. It's like you're arguing that > businesspeople cannot write applications for X (or for MS Windows, for > that matter), because the reality of business code is that it almost > always requires modifications to the X server or xlib, except in the > case of X this is okay, because the business can ship binary only X > servers that can run their application... If you want an open license written by lawyers, I suggest the CPL from IBM. IBM has lots of lawyers, and I'm sure they would "get things right." http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-cplfaq.html (Got link from the Eclipse FAQ page: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/main.html ) I'm not saying change Fresco, but that here is what lawyers come up with for a public license. OpenOffice.org has something similar. Yes, commercial businesses _do_ want to contribute. They also want to feel safe and protected. The X Consortium license isn't a good starting place, IMHO. Anyone remember the XFree86 project declaring a branch from their code base...? ======================== The topic of licensing using an "GPL" style license comes up kinda reguarly on various mailing lists. Is there a newsgroup or ML where things can be dicussed? Maybe a few wannabe lawyers hanging out rendering a legal prespective? --------------------------------------------------------------------- brian witt Railroads, computers, sailboats, etc. [email protected]