Re: [Fresco-devel] Release status

Neil Pilgrim <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.fresco.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> 
> I've been looking over the milestone bugs, since we tentatively
> scheduled a release for Monday.  The best thing to look at is the
> graph at
>    http://issues.fresco.org/graph?type=milestone&id=2&output=cmap
> , and the official page is http://issues.fresco.org/milestone2 .

The maps are now linked to on each page, thanks to a recent change by
Nick :)

> Bugs/tasks still unclosed:
>   -- http://issues.fresco.org/bug137
>      we don't distinguish between COMM_FAILURE and TRANSIENT
>      exceptions.  I don't entirely understand the problem from reading
>      the bug discussion, and I'm not sure this should actually be on
>      the M2 list.

This is really about if we want to know how to distinguish between a
failure to start a call and a failure mid-call. Early corba versions
(ie. what omni3 supports) did not specify a difference iirc, so we used
one or the other. In some cases, we don't care about the distinction, so
we should perhaps either catch a SystemException or include separate
blocks for each of the above. If we *do* care, we need a wrapper for
that. This should be a dependency of bug180 - what would be useful in
roundup would be to have something where if a bug is in a milestone but
a bug depending upon that bug is also in the same milestone, then the
child bug is not shown - by definition the parent is only complete when
the child is also. Maybe this could be a toggle option in the milestone
display.

>   -- http://issues.fresco.org/bug176
>      a request to probe the Console for supported resolutions when
>      starting the server.  I definitely don't see why this is on M2,
>      unless someone is planning implement it tomorrow anyway.

This was something I reported and was going to look into, but I don't
have enough time at the moment :(

>   -- http://issues.fresco.org/bug180
>      "catch more exceptions in the server".  This is very open-ended,
>      and some of the cases have been dealt with.  Is anything else
>      needed before a release?  I'd be fine with not getting this bug
>      _closed_ for M2 -- it's too open-ended for that...

Agreed.

>   -- http://issues.fresco.org/bug190 , http://issues.fresco.org/bug190
>      Problems with scrollbars under rotation.  Do these still exist?
>      Does anyone have any idea what's going on here?  Is anyone going
>      to try and fix them by Monday?

As I remember, this bug is still present, from what I heard someone say
recently...

>   -- http://issues.fresco.org/bug192
>      The Motif radio boxes can be unselected.  From the comments, it
>      looks like Neil has a fix, except it triggers another bug of some
>      sort... what's the status here?

I supplied some kind of basic patch iirc, but was waiting for someone
with more knowledge of the internals to comment on whether it was my
limited knowledge or a problem with the design of the radio-boxes.

[snip task30/82]

Progress hasn't been too bad really, though maybe if I can get my thesis
written quickly I can make it better ;)

-- 
Neil
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.