Re: [Fresco-devel] Bug 223 - "*-config scripts have inappropriate --cxxflags output"
Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:37:56 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.fresco.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:17:09AM -0500, Stefan Seefeld wrote: [...] > I don't quite agree. The issue is not whether '-g' is generally > considered bad or not, but whether I want to compile everything with > debug support. > > I do want the ability to define (either with --with-optimization style > params or more fine-grained with CXXFLAGS="-foo -bar") how the compiler > behaves. For all I know, setting CXXFLAGS before calling configure works perfectly. If not, then file a separate bug :-) > I agree that in all cases we should mark which of those flags are to be > exported, i.e. are vital for applications that want to build with our > libs (such as -pthread). Right, that's the bug under discussion. Do we actually have any such flags right now? (Arguably -pthread would be the example, except I'm not clear whether -pthread actually does anything that -lpthread doesn't, and -lpthread is in the link flags, not the cxxflags.) -- Nathaniel -- Details are all that matters; God dwells there, and you never get to see Him if you don't struggle to get them right. -- Stephen Jay Gould This email may be read aloud.