Re: Visual Studio .NET 2003 port

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.gephex.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> >>Since there is a free version of QT 3.2 delivered witht the book now I 
> >>propose that when everything is working fine to drop support for not 
> >>only QT 2.3 but also Visual Studio 6. I can't see anybody maintaining 
> >>the windows side for both IDEs/Compilers in the long run....what do you
> say?

> >Please do not merge this into --main--!
> >This is a huge change on the win32 side and should not be
> >done before 0.4.1.
> >Apart from new bugs: do you know how much time it took to get the
> >automatic console build working?

<..>

> Again: this is not a change! It's an addition to the exisiting code base 
> that is targeted towards people working on windows with up-to-date 
> compilers. So I don't see the point AT ALL why not to merge this into main.

OK, I think I got your message wrong. 
I understood that you want to replace the VS6 build system with the
VS.NET build system (see quote on top). My answer applies to this change,
not to the addition of VS.NET build files. As long as it does not break
the VS6 build I have, of course, nothing against this addition.

Georg
 
> -coma
> _______________________________________________
> gephex-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gephex.org/mailman/listinfo/gephex-devel
> 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.