Re: c++ linktypes
Philipp Promesberger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gephex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Georg Seidel wrote: > [...] > > ~ * functions for binary serialization which must be implemented > ~ (with them the core can save the state of the graph) Yes. > ~ * maybe make the ascii serialisation optional by moving them > ~ into an "AsciiSerializableLink" subclass (images and audio > ~ data maybe wont allow serialization to ascii) > Hm, i definitely don't want to have too many abstract functions in the interface, since it makes things anoying (IMHO). This is a part we should probably think through very thoroughly, since the unit serialization mechanisms should be exactly the same. But then, maybe for units a mandatory ascii serialization function would make a lot more sense..... I'm not really sure with this, have to think about it a bit more :) -philipp