Re: frei0r problem with the range of f0r_param_double
Martin Bayer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gephex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Jean-Sebastien Senecal] > We faced a similar problem in Drone. What we concluded is that no > range should be forced at any time. This encourages experimentations > from the user. The ranges should be seen more as some kind of "default > values" within which the effect will be visible; > outside of this range, > the user is left on his own... but may discover new things. for example a segmentation fault effect :) Martin _______________________________________________ gephex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gephex.org/mailman/listinfo/gephex-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 256 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBwx0OCm3i57PRsbsRAqi2AJ9KyO8KQVSgFfNh5Q/yyRJhQdvbPACguNqY FXp3sDl/K+5Ks5LOQrwT7DM= =XeK9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----