Re: Information about ffmpeg compile problems on windows

"Philipp Promesberger [c]" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:41:29 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.gephex.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Georg Seidel wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>  
>
>>>Philipp: can you please post the steps you carried out to
>>>compile a new ffmpeg version on win32?
>>>      
>>>
>>I changed some const static into static (just look at the unresolved
>>reference and change it in the corresponding file)
>>I just posted this step by step but then my computer crashed and I'm too
>>lazy to do it again since I tried compiling 0.4.9pre1 on msys and this
>>one links fine (gives warnings though).
>>    
>>
>
>0.4.9pre1 is much older than the version we used for gephex-0.4.3.
>
>  
>
>>Also does the latest cvs-snapshot.
>>    
>>
>
>Ah, that's interesting. Then we should update our ffmpeg-cvs archive.
>  
>

Oh...sorry...mixed things up. The cvs snapshot i got is 
ffmpeg-cvs-2004-07-12...this is probably the same as 0.4.9.pre
I'll try again:)

-coma


--
------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------
To: [email protected].
For your security, [email protected]
digitally signed this message on 26 June 2005 at 22:37:00 UTC.
Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify.
------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] -------------------
Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAVdnZXBoZXgtZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZ2VwaGV4Lm9yZwBjb21hQGdlc
GhleC5vcmcAZW1haWwgYm9keQC7AgAAfAB8AAAAAQAAAAwuv0K7AgAAdQIAAgACAAIAIB
+oZ0QQT9njneW0BJbMBFNhWVl5dPLKbVD4NhL1uvURAQCAY+pi9xDkKQY80xF9IH5q1/2
gCQ+37YHuT7nVIQT0MWVoAQ6TTm3oBFj4aH/k9SsUTETBPXBIQxg3Ptq5MTywJNWxU2ln
RW5k
--------------------- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ---------------------