Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp "make install" fails with undefined references to fresh-built gegl

Ken Moffat via gimp-developer-list <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.gimp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 02:39:08PM -0700, Deft Developer wrote:
> I got all of the dependencies (except WebKit) and GIMP 2.10.20 to build on
> CentOS.
> To make a very long  story short, each dependency, and GIMP, is best built
> with no traces of previous builds or out-of-date dependencies. "make clean"
> and re-configuring  are inadequate. It's easiest just to re-clone each
> repository, or delete each extracted source directory.
> Each dependency needs to be installed into whatever build-prefix is
> configured, and then the next dependency may be built. Sometimes, Iterating
> over multiple versions of a dependency is required. In that case,
> delete/uninstall the older version after you have built what needed it, and
> then build the newer version.
> 
> I simply gave up for webkit. Webkit is gigantic, and has a wilderness of
> dependencies. It easier just to use an external browser to access GIMP help.
> 
First, I'm glad you fixed it.

Second, for webkit my impression is that gimp-2.10 looks for an
ancient version.  Certainly, using firefox to access the online help
has worked fine for me in the last couple of years.

ĸen
-- 
       He died at the console, of hunger and thirst.
       Next day he was buried, face-down, nine-edge first.
                              - the perfect programmer
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    [email protected]
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.