Re: [Gimp-web] Website overhaul

Pat David <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.gimp.web
Message-ID <CAPC+-knrXtAH2NJqtnbk1UhsQCAs-a=CjxoeBrEqn--0rz4Jxw@mail.gmail.com>
What about the current website is lacking?

The question is a loaded one intended to start down the long, arduous path
that Alexandre already mentioned, which is to approach the problem from a
cohesive user standpoint, through requirements, design and delivery.

I too would like to tackle it, but currently am a bit busy with other
things as well.  I may take a stab at some point at some rudimentary
analysis and throw it over the fence to discuss, but any serious discussion
about changes to the site should probably be done in a focused and
thoughtful way.


On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Roberto Schiavone <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> ​​@Alexandre, why not? You're right, list of specs, wireframing, etc.
> should be done. Also, Google Analytics could be very useful.
>
> @Dustin no, plain HTML/CSS(actually I use Jekyll to build pages, but
> they're all static), I didn't even use any UI framework like Twitter
> Bootstrap.
>
> @Philipp I don't think so, I had a hard time looking for this mailing list
> and for source code. The only thing changed in seven years(
> https://web.archive.org/web/20071231122551/http://www.gimp.org/) is only
> the banner and the "Make a donation" button. Lots of things have changed in
> these years, we now have HTML5 and CSS3, and responsive design is the
> standard now.
>
> @Michael I understand, but the ultimate goal is to improve the website.
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-web-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list
>


-- 
pat david
http://blog.patdavid.net
_______________________________________________
gimp-web-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.