Re: [Gimp-web] Proposal: gimp-web-revamp

On 05/01/15 14:56, Cristobal wrote:
> 
>> BTW, I'm not sure if adding gitolite is really necessary - or even
>> possible; we are using the GNOME Git repository, and they are in charge
>> of access control there.
> 

So I talked with some of you on IRC yesterday and the idea is to keep
using Gnome servers and Gitolite would not be a necessary step for us.

What do you guys think of the rest of the proposal, specifically about
using Jekyll (or Pelican, or some other app) and reorganize the website
structure in order to separate content from design? What do you think of
the designs proposals (A, B, C, D)?

Do you want to give this proposal a try (after a proper discussion)?

Looking forward to hear from you.

Best,
Cristobal
GPG: 2ACA 8DD4 444E 358F B72E  8C3C 7196 690D 9E03 CDFD

_______________________________________________
gimp-web-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=w7a4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----