Re: [Gimp-web] Microdata markup formats
Andrew Toskin <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:35:51 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gimp.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You can definitely mix and match microdata formats without causing any issues, unless maybe you accidentally put conflicting information between the different formats. Changes to metadata in one format will need to be updated in all other formats. Shouldn't be too hard to keep straight. Microformats might be a good choice too -- http://microformats.org/wiki /Main_Page -- its markup only uses class and rel attributes, so it neatly blends in with normal HTML. And if we applied CSS based on the Microformats class attributes (which could be appropriate, for example, with the h-card class for GIMP contact information), then we could actually minimize how much extra markup the microdata adds to every page. I like OpenGraph too, because it's the easiest to understand and implement -- just add a few <meta> tags to the document <head> instead of trying to incorporate microdata throughout the page -- and pretty widely supported. ~Andrew On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 18:09 +0000, Pat David wrote: > I'm in the middle of adding micordata markup the WGO and was > wondering if > anyone had any input concerning implementation, types, or formats. > > At the moment I'm going to focus on both schema.org microdata > (considering > JSON-LD, but likely microdata atm) and opengraph. I can't seem to > find any > issues with using both at the same time. If someone knows, please > chime in. > _______________________________________________ > gimp-web-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list _______________________________________________ gimp-web-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list