Re: [Gimp-web] "Free Software" vs. "Open Source"
Pat David <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:44:29 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gimp.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPC+-kmtE6YshwZdygP40Y8g1qc_4OGJDQDLGP05-a57VPa3Hw@mail.gmail.com> |
I prefer the original as well. Unless there's a compelling argument for changing it, I'll leave it as is. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:38 AM Alexandre Prokoudine < [email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Pat David wrote: > > Referring to this bug report: > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758510 > > > > Should I change the lead description text to just "The Free Software > Image > > Editor"? > > Aren't "software" and "editor" mutually exclusive in this case? > > Anyway, I don't see what's wrong with "The Free & Open Source Image > Editor". It uses the word "free", and the "open source" bit serves > nicely as an explanation what kind of free it is. > > If purists have a problem with that, I dare say they might go ahead > and create a free gnu whatever image editor of their own. Godspeed > with that. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > gimp-web-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list >