Re: Re: console window
"Phroggie" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:00:59 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gimp.windows.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <007001c2c668$b895aaf0$8601a8c0@charlotte> |
Maybe something along these lines would be nice: g_log_set_handler(ALL_DOMAINS, G_LOG_LEVEL_ALL, log_handler, NULL). Maybe instead, one could simply #define NO_CONSOLE, and it would nullify anything attempting to write to a console. I'm sure that there's many ways to accomplish something similar to this. These needn't apply only to window's glib, either, as I'm sure there's *nix applications looking for similiar log handling. I agree with Allin, though. I think that a console window should appear unless the application specificaly requests not to spawn a console, whether it be through numerous g_log_set_handler calls or some other means. --Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: Allin Cottrell To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 18:12 Subject: RE: [gimpwin-dev] Re: console window > On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > > I guess this boils down to, which is worse, irritating warning > > messages now and then in ugly white-on-black console windows (that > > some people insist calling "DOS boxes", brrrr), or losing > > potentially useful warning and error messages? > > I say leave well alone. The warnings may be useful to the programmer, > but if he/she decides in the end they are meaningless, he/she can > suppress them via g_log_set_handler(). > > Allin Cottrell. To Post a message, send it to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/