Re: Missing symbols in def files

At 10:36 AM 2/26/2003 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>Note that I think it is a good idea anyway for Tor (or anyone for that
>matter) to produce Gtk+ binaries using official versions, instead of
>using intermediate snapshot, which can be confusing.

I agree with the idea of sticking to official release versions. In the 
meantime I will patch gtkmm (either on the CVS server or on my local cvs 
tree) to #ifdef the missing functions. Those #ifdefs will be removed when a 
new version of glib/atk/gtk+ (2.2.2) is released with the missing symbols.

By the way, I found a few symbols I forgot to add to the list I posted. I 
will send an updated list as soon as I can.

Cedric

P.S. : Any reason why you don't use --export-all-symbols. Is it for 
compatibility with MSVC++ that you need a def file ?
P.P.S : I also agree with the people who asked for a standard, unique, 
official Windows Installer for gtk+-2.x (maybe with liblade, glade added to 
the distribution). I also provide win32 binaries for pygtk-1.99.x and a 
central repository would help the users a lot.