Re: RES: Libs for cross compilation
Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Mar 2003 06:41:19 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gimp.windows.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Friendly Ghost writes: > The next stage is to find out how to statically link. Don't. So much of GTK's and Pango's functionality depends on it finding its installation location at run time, which is handled by the DllMain function. DLLs feel so much the "Right Thing" on Windows. Too much hassle building also static libraries. Please also consider what the LGPL (GNU library general public license) says: If you link a program with the library, you must provide complete object files to the recipients so that they can relink them with the library, after making changes to the library and recompiling it. I.e. if you link GLib, Pango, Atk or GTK statically with a program that you distribute, you *must* also make available the object files to your program so that users can make changes to GTK, and relink the program. Presumable you must also make available instructions how to build said LGPL libraries statically, as the normal distributions doesn't provide for such builds. > What names static libs have? That depends on who builds them, and how... libtool presumably would call them (for instance) libgtk-win32-2.0.a. I think Hans Breuer has used a "s" suffix in the basename, maybe libgtk-win32-2.0s.lib? > And what are .dll.a? Import libraries (for gcc). > My program itself if striped weights about 60Kb. With all those libs it > weights about 2Mb and that's terrible. If your program is that small, maybe you should reconsider whether GTK is the right toolkit for it. Or maybe you should think this way: *your* code is 60 kB, but all the functionality that GTK and Pango gives you are an essential part of the program's user interface, too. Where did you get the 2 MB from, the GTK, Pango and GLib runtimes are well over 3.5 MB zipped... > If I'm correct that's how Patric did with his X-Chat. It only weights > 600Kb and it's only one file. And it is much bigger program than mine is. I don't know X-Chat or what its creator has done, but especially in an interactive application handling text, it would seem very silly and narrowminded to for instance cripple GTK's i18n features, complex text support, etc, just to make the distributable smaller. --tml