Re: iconv.dll should be libiconv.dll??

Cameron Gregory writes:
 > > there is (was) a libiconv.a, wasn't there? That is enough. The
 > > .dll. part of the libfoo.dll.a name is just libtool's convention. (And
 > 
 > umm .. no, not in your old one, or the new one.
 > (libiconv-1.7-w32.bin.zip)

In that case just rename iconv.lib to libiconv.a, that works
fine. Umm, now I remember, this is probably also the cause for the
warning message you got from libtool: Libtool doesn't know about
foo.lib style libraries, it only looks for libfoo.a, I think. Or maybe
also libfoo.dll.a. Confusing? Sure.

--tml