gimpwin-dev future?

I wrote:
 > > Or maybe gimpwin-dev could be terminated altogether, and
 > > the members advised to subscribe to one or several of gimp-developer,
 > > gtk-list, gtk-app-devel-list and gtk-devel-list.

Arnaud Charlet wrote:
 > Sounds very reasonable to me. It is indeed somewhat strange for people
 > only interested in Gtk+ to read about Gimp issues, and same thing
 > the other way around I guess :-)

What do other people on gimpwin-dev think? Is gimpwin-dev required any
longer? Would it be OK if the list was shut down and the members
advised to subscribe to (an appropriate subset of) these other lists:
(Quote from http://www.gimp.org/mailing_list.html and
http://www.gtk.org/mailinglists.html)

gimp-developer: For plug-in developers and `core' program
developers. Here you will find patches to the source code and
discussion about The Gimp development in general.

gtk-list: General topics related to GTK+, including everything from
discussion of proposed new features to questions about compiling GTK+.

gtk-app-devel-list: Discussion on this list is oriented toward
developing applications with GTK+. This has been a lower traffic list
which is good for asking simple GTK+ questions

gtk-devel-list: This list is for developers of GTK+ to discuss
code. General GTK+ questions should not be asked on this list, as that
is more appropriate for gtk-list. Requests for new features should not
be sent to this list, as that is also more appropriate for gtk-list.

--tml