Re: re: copyright
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.graphicsmagick.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For the record the author text has *never* been removed from the GraphicsMagick files. This can easily be verified since the full history is available via GraphicsMagick CVS. There was a period of time (as can be expected) that the development file headers were in flux. We were faced with hundreds and hundreds of files which needed a header update. The headers were typically 60 lines long, with varying formatting, and distributed across many subdirectories. The first step was to simply substitue "GraphicsMagick Group" for "ImageMagick Studio" and include text in Copyright.txt which stated that *all* of the files (at that time) not explicitly covered by a different copyright were also copyright "ImageMagick Studio". When there was the opportunity, I wrote a program which successfully dealt with replacing the file headers. There were several renditions of the headers until we ended up with a format which we felt did justice to *all* of the copyright holders (not only ImageMagick Studio) while keeping the header down to manageable size. We did some searches and analysis and determined that a number of (four) copyright statements were missing, so we added the missing statements based on the best information available. It was necessary for us to annotate the copyrights at the per-file level in order to ensure that there would be no confusion in the future. Copyrights are not about personal attribution. They are not about feeling good. They are about obeying the law, and respecting the rights of the copyright holder. We have done our best to respect the copyrights of ImageMagick Studio and the other copyright holders and will continue to do so in the future. I have no interest in diminishing ImageMagick, far from it. I am proud to have helped to develop ImageMagick. There is still a framed ImageMagick logo picture on my wall. I am still happy to help ImageMagick users with using ImageMagick. I believe that the other GraphicsMagick Group members feel the same pride that I do. Since we are no longer welcome to develop ImageMagick (I am still confused as to how/why that came about), we are developing GraphicsMagick. Naturally we want GraphicsMagick to succeed. By observing each other's rights in an above-board fashion, we can establish a level playing field so that users can choose the package they prefer without concern that someone's legal rights are being violated. Thanks, Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [email protected] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com