Re: Proposed PNG eXIf chunk
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]> Mon, 29 May 2017 09:10:56 -0500 (CDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.graphicsmagick.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 28 May 2017, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote: > > I'm thinking of updating the proposal to declare that the thumbnail > should not be > included in the exIf chunk data, and rewriting the ImageMagick chunk support to > eliminate or ignore it. > > People wanting to preserve the thumbnail should use a different > private chunk for that. > > Thoughts? This seems reasonable to me. Storing thumbnails in image files is not generally useful since applications which use thumbnails are already prepared to create them, and the application usually has its own (often user-specified) requirements for the thumbnails, and its own way to cache them. Stored thumbnails can also lie about the actual image content so they should not be trusted. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot