Re: libjpeg thread safe constraint is not must
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.graphicsmagick.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, yzh杨振宏 wrote: >>> it should be make more accessible (e.g. via a configure option or even somehow autodetected). > Brilliant. I don't know GM has SETJMP_IS_THREAD_SAFE flag until I wrote an e-mail to GM-help and Glenn told me. > > To make full use of CPU, our solution is use multi-process structure, and process number is set to CPU core number. In our practice, this architecture is not friendly to Devops, and what's more, it put huge pressure on resources. For example, one hundred 8 core machines will establish at least 800 connections to database. This push us to look for multi-thread solution. > > Back to the point, when can this feature release? We will test it in the first time. I will make sure to add configure support for it to be included in the next GM release. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Graphicsmagick-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/graphicsmagick-help