Re: Equivalent of ImageMagick's -fx in GrahicsMagick?
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.graphicsmagick.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Nekomune wrote: > Hey Bob, > > Neat! I used a reference identity image to solve my immediate problem. > > I can consider -operator for other processes I might want to do in the > future, but it does not looks as flexible as -fx. It is not as flexible as -fx, but it sure is a whole lot faster! With -fx you can visually 'feel' the processing taking considerable time even with a small image whereas there is virtually no perceptible execution time with -operator. When considering a need for something as flexible as -fx then also consider using a higher-level scripting interface to GraphicsMagick or even a compiled language such as C/C++. Also consider using the rarely-used pluggable filter system which allows adding intermediate processing modules to GraphicsMagick. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot