Re: [graphviz-interest] fdp layout vs dot layout

So, answering myself, I found the following solution that kind of addressed
the problem

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2012036/graphviz-how-to-connect-subgraphs


On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Jose Juan Tapia <[email protected]> wrote:

> So when rendering the attached dot graph (
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7096948/simple.dot) to an image using
> the dot command
>
> dot -Tpng bipartite_map_rcp.dot -osimple.png
>
> I get a semi nice layout for all my nodes, with the exception of many of
> the edges coming out wrong since dot doesn't support subgraph to subgraph
> or subgraph to node edges (and instead creates new nodes with the names of
> the subgraphs it was supposed to connect as shown by the image simple.png (
> http://i.imgur.com/vnMKhZk.jpg)
>
> If you instead use fdp
> fdp -Tpng bipartite_map_rcp.dot -osimple2.png (http://imgur.com/4JKgag5)
>
>
> You get some pretty messy layout, although the edges come out fine as
> shown by simple2.png.
>
> The question would be if there's a way to get fdp to use dot's default
> layout while getting the edges right. Thank you.
>
>
>
> --
> José Juan Tapia Valenzuela
> Research Associate
> University of Pittsburgh
> 3076.1 Biological Sciences Tower 3
> Pittsburgh, Pa 15260
>



-- 
José Juan Tapia Valenzuela
Research Associate
University of Pittsburgh
3076.1 Biological Sciences Tower 3
Pittsburgh, Pa 15260

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/graphviz-interest