Re: [graphviz-interest] Is DOT syntax ambiguous re node names and subgraph names?

Hi

Sorry, renamed things in the dot file after writing the text. It should 
read:

Am I correct in thinking the attached (previous email) shows a situation 
where, to disambiguate, dot (by convention) takes 'one' and 
'cluster_four' as node names rather than subgraph names?

Is the decision documented somewhere? I couldn't see it on
http://www.graphviz.org/content/dot-language.

On 19/11/14 10:06, Ron Savage wrote:
> Hi
>
> See attached.
>
> Am I correct in thinking the attached shows a situation where, to
> disambiguate, dot (by convention) takes 'two' and 'cluster_five' as node
> names rather than subgraph names?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]
> http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/graphviz-interest
>

-- 
Ron Savage - savage.net.au
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/graphviz-interest