Re: Let's go for it then...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Oztan Harmanci" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Hdot264-devel] Let's go for it then...


> >     Then is easy, just fill in the gaps... ;-)  As i commented long ago
> IMHO the
> > best first milestone must be to have a compliant intra coder
>
> Yes, I remember you saying that but I partially agree: I agree
> with the only INTRA frame approach, but  I find it easier to
> write the decoder first(since it is the decoder the standard specifies).
> Especially with the help of the trace files generated by the reference
> software it becomes even easier to debug.
>
> Maybe we can write the encoder and decoder in parallel but I dont think
> we can manage that(can we?). I prefer starting with the decoder unless
> people really want the encoder first. I'd like to hear from others too.
>
> Oztan
>

My 'assignment' is mostly directed towards the encoding part so I'm planning
to spent most of my time on that part.  However, I don't think you can see
them both seperatly.  Ideas for one side can just as well be used for the
other side.  Parallel developing just seems the best way to go if you ask
me.  Maybe we should split up in 2 parts for the developing purpose but
still keep an eye on the other part.

Yves

BTW next week I'm on holiday.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1