Re: Any plans to document ImageMagick?

In article <[email protected]>,
    Richard Neill <[email protected]>  writes:

> While one is at this, Might I request putting some more stuff back into 
> the man page? "man convert" is exceptionally terse, and, while it does 
> contain a pointer to the HTML docs, this isn't ideal.

My problem with the documentation is that I *know* IM can do
something, but for the life of me I can't find the magic flag that
does it.  The -help output is too terse to be of any use unless you
already know what the flag does but temporarily forgot its name.  I
think part of this problem stems from the fact that "convert" is a
single utility that does *everything*, so you just run out of good
names for command-line arguments after a while and have to start
picking names that are euphamisms for what is done instead of
something descriptive or intuitive.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
      <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>

        Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>